You are currently browsing EDRi's old website. Our new website is available at

If you wish to help EDRI promote digital rights, please consider making a private donation.

Flattr this


EDRi booklets

UK Government ignores the European Commission regarding Phorm

25 February, 2009

This article is also available in:
Deutsch: Britische Regierung ignoriert bei Phorm die Europäische Kommission

This article is also available in:
Macedonian: Британската влада го игнорира предупр...

On 12 February 2009, the European Commission warned it would take formal action against the UK Government for not providing the requested information on the past trials of the Phorm ad-serving technology.

The Commission has sent three letters until now requesting information on the secret trials by BT of Phorm, the latest having been sent at the end of January 2009. No satisfactory answers have been received so far, the response having focused only on future deployments without addressing the question of the past trials.

The trials, conducted in 2006 and 2007, tracking the browsing behaviour of BT customers without their consent, resulted in complaints from privacy campaigners, peers, and politicians who argued that the actions were in breach of UK interception and data-protection laws. In July 2008, technology campaigner Alexander Hanff made a complaint to the police force considering the BT trials were not in compliance with RIPA and the Data Protection Act as the customers' consent had not been required.

However, the City of London police informed Hanff in September 2008 that they would not continue the investigation for "lack of criminal intent".

"One of the main reasons for this decision is the lack of criminal intent on behalf of BT and Phorm in relation to the tests. It is also believed that there would have been a level of implied consent from BT's customers in relation to the tests, as the aim was to enhance their products," wrote detective sergeant Barry Murray.

Although UK regulators have provided rules for the future deployments of Phorm which require the company to not retain website history data, exclude sensitive search topics and obtain the customer's agreement also providing information of the respective technology, according to UK's EDRi-member Open Rights Group, it is not yet clear whether the consent of both the users and the visited websites is required.

"Unless the ISPs employing Phorm's technology to intercept the communications between their customers and the owners of the websites their customers are visiting have the explicit consent of both parties, they are likely to be committing an offence under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), the legislation that governs interception of communications in the UK," stated the group.

In spite of the repeated questions and investigations and disregarding the European Commission's warning, Phorm goes on. The company's CEO stated during an interview on 9 February that the system would be active in the UK by the end of 2009. The company has also signed deals with another two big UK ISPs, Carphone Warehouse and Virgin Media.

EC warns gov't over Phorm foot-dragging (12.02.2009),1000000189,39615480,00.htm

BT finishes trial, expects to use Phorm (15.12.2008),1000000085,39578006,00.htm

Police drop investigation into BT's Phorm trials (23.09.2008),1000000189,39492793,00.htm

Phorm: damn the EU, full speed ahead! (11.02.2009)

EU calls phoul over ad company Phorm's invasive snooping (15.08.2008)

EDRIgram: UK: Phorm threat (28.01.2009)



Syndicate contentCreative Commons License

With financial support from the EU's Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Programme.
eu logo