You are currently browsing EDRi's old website. Our new website is available at https://edri.org

If you wish to help EDRI promote digital rights, please consider making a private donation.


Flattr this

logo

EDRi booklets

Germany: Google must remove autocomplete harmful searches if notified

22 May, 2013
» 

On 14 May 2013, the German Federal Court ruled that Google auto-complete feature may, under certain circumstances, constitute an infringement of the personality right, under the German Civil Code and the German Basic Law.

Since April 2009, Google has introduced an "autocomplete" feature integrated into the search engine, which automatically brings forth suggestions, as word combinations, when a user enters a search in a window. The displayed suggestions are made on the basis of an algorithm including the number of related search queries entered by other users. By introducing keywords into the search engine, users may thus obtain access to third party content posted to the Internet via a displayed list of related searches.

The case was brought to court by a public company and its CEO who had discovered that when introducing his name on google.de, Google's autocomplete suggested the terms “scientology” and "fraud".

This raises a serious question of possible defamation and it can create a serious possibility for anti-sale attacks just by introducing negative keywords related to certain companies or people, especially as there are several countries where there is no risk of legal liability for the use of the autocomplete feature.

In a decision that overruled two previous lower court decisions, the Federal Court decided that Google must ensure that the terms generated by auto-complete are not offensive or defamatory and that it must remove defamatory word combinations when notified.

Google has defended itself in the past by arguing that it has no control over the combinations of words that auto-complete suggests. The court took this into consideration by deciding that Google was legally liable only when becoming aware of a case of defamatory word suggestions. "The operator is, as a basic principle, only responsible when it gets notice of the unlawful violation of personal rights."

Autocomplete: can Google turn bad news into good profit? (14.05.2013)
http://ipkitten.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/autocomplete-can-google-turn-ba...

Federal Supreme Court decides on the admissibility of personality infringing of the Search addenda to "Google" (only in German, 14.05.2013)
http://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?G...

Germany tells Google to tidy up auto-complete (14.05.2013)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22529357

 

Syndicate:

Syndicate contentCreative Commons License

With financial support from the EU's Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Programme.
eu logo