You are currently browsing EDRi's old website. Our new website is available at

If you wish to help EDRI promote digital rights, please consider making a private donation.

Flattr this


EDRi booklets

CoE refuses to start investigation on biometrics

18 May, 2011

This article is also available in:
Deutsch: Europarat lehnt Biometrie-Untersuchung ab

In an answer to the 31 March 2011 petition calling the Council of Europe (CoE) to start an in-depth survey under Article 52 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Thorbjørn Jagland, the Secretary General of the CoE refused to start an investigation on the collection and storage of citizens' biometric data by member states.

In his answer, Secretary General Jagland mainly points to the CoE Resolution 1797, adopted in March 2011. He does stress the need to take steps to ensure that relevant existing legal frameworks, including European data protection Convention 108, be enhanced and modernised. However, the Secretary General doesn't explain his refusal to investigate the legality of the current national biometric schemes. Instead, Mr. Jagland refers to various other Council of Europe bodies, such as the Parliamentary Assembly, the commissioner for Human Rights and the Consultative Committee of Convention 108.

In a first reaction to the response from Strasbourg, an alliance spokesperson said: "The lack of protection of citizens rights against government use of biometrics is stunning. Moreover, the digital fingerscan technique itself is immature. For example a government test in the Netherlands, published after our petition, showed biometric verification failure rates of 21%. A test by the mayor of the city of Roermond revealed that for no less than one in every five persons collecting travel documents, the initial fingerprint scan had been so bad that it wasn't verifiable. So how can you ever reach the goals of the Passport Laws by storing these on the document chip? This confirms once again that an in-depth survey has to be conducted soon on whether the human rights guarantees and conditions of necessity (effectiveness, proportionality, subsidiarity and safety guarantees) set by the European Convention on Human Rights and the data protection Convention are indeed upheld in the countries involved."

The more than 80 petition signatories from 27 countries, including EDRi, include - among others - digital, civil and human rights defenders, media, legal and medical organisations, academia, politicians and personal victims without a passport because of objections involving the biometric storage.

Petition to Council of Europe on government use of citizens biometrics (updated on 12.05.2011)

Answer of Council of Europe (29.04.2011)

EDRi-gram: NGOs ask CoE to investigate government collection of biometrics (6.04.2011)



Syndicate contentCreative Commons License

With financial support from the EU's Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Programme.
eu logo